Skip to main content
File #: 25-723    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 7/8/2025 In control: Lake County Air Quality Management District
On agenda: 7/15/2025 Final action:
Title: 11:00 A.M. - (Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors) Consideration of the Continued Discussion of the Draft Replacement Fee Schedule (Rules 660-668)
Sponsors: Lake County Air Quality Management District
Attachments: 1. Fee comparison 20250715, 2. Fee study summary 20250715
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Memorandum

 

 

Date:                                          July 15, 2025

 

To:                                          The Honorable Eddie Crandell, Chair, Lake County Board of Supervisors

 

From:                                          Douglas Gearhart, APCO

 

Subject:                     11:00 A.M. - (Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District Board of Directors) Consideration of the Continued Discussion of the Draft Replacement Fee Schedule (Rules 660-668)

 

Executive Summary:

 

The Lake County Air Quality Management District (District) is required to follow the legal

process outlined in California Health and Safety Code in order to adopt new rules or fees,

modify existing rules, and repeal rules. This is a continuation of the discussion from the

workshop and hearing held on June 10, 2025.

 

The District is proposing to repeal the existing fee rules and replace them with a new fee

rule and structure. The new structure is intended to provide clarity and better transparency

to the District fees. The fee rule proposed is considered a new rule under CA H&SC

41512.7. The District has not increased fees since 1996, other than implementation of burn

permit fees in 2003 and annual CPI adjustments. The costs of operation and requirements

placed on the District have increased significantly more than CPI since then.

 

The attachments provided include the fee study summary based on staff time to perform

tasks, a fee comparison of existing permitted sources and the total proposed new fees, and

the proposed implementation schedule for existing permitted sources. The recommendation

proposes to implement the fees for existing permitted sources over 3 years. The initial fee

increase for existing sources would not take affect until 2026 thus allowing time for EPA

and ARB approval and for District staff to implement the conversion.

 

If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:

Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________ 

 

Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply):                                           Not applicable

Fully Article X. <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI>- and/or Consultant Selection Policy <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Policy/Policies+$!26+Procedures+Manual/Ch4_2021v2.pdf>-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)                     

Section 2-38 <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI> Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)                     

For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Intranet+Forms/Information+Technology/AdvPlan.pdf> (“Yes,” if checked)

Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)

 

Consistency with Vision 2028 <http://www.lakecountyca.gov/Government/Directory/Administration/Visioning/Vision2028.htm> (check all that apply):                                                                Not applicable

Well-being of Residents                                           Public Safety                                                                Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery                     

Economic Development                                           Infrastructure                                                                County Workforce                     

Community Collaboration                      Business Process Efficiency                      Clear Lake                                                               

 

Recommended Action: Accept public comment and approve District Staff submittal of proposed rules to ARB and EPA for comment and to bring the final rules back to the Board of Directors for consideration of adoption.