Memorandum
Date: June 17, 2026
To: The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors
From: Elise Jones, Behavioral Health Services Director
Subject: Behavioral Health Fiscal Stabilization and Reform Readiness Workshop.
Executive Summary:
Lake County Behavioral Health Services requests that the Board of Supervisors receive a fiscal stabilization and reform-readiness presentation and provide policy direction regarding resolution of the remaining $2 million General Fund loan balance.
The Department’s current fiscal position is best understood as the result of successful service expansion occurring at the same time as major State payment reform, Electronic Health Record implementation, local-match/IGT sequencing requirements, reimbursement timing issues, provider payment lag, and State offsets. The Department significantly expanded access to medically necessary behavioral health services, including mobile crisis, school-based services, DMC-ODS, medication-assisted treatment, justice-involved services, CARE Act-related work, and opioid settlement-funded service development. This work has produced meaningful community benefit and has drawn County, State, and statewide recognition.
However, the financing infrastructure supporting these services did not keep pace with the scale and timing of the expansion. Under CalAIM payment reform, services may generate reimbursable value, but reimbursement is not immediately available as usable cash. The County must maintain sufficient local match in the SMHS IGT/CFA account before certain federal reimbursements can be released. DHCS initially frontloaded Lake County’s IGT account by approximately $250,000 based on estimated monthly service volume, but current SMHS IGT need is closer to $1 million per month. This created a structural cash-flow mismatch during a period of rapid service growth.
The Department is now showing signs of stabilization. Current Budget Unit 145 year-to-date revenues exceed expenditures by approximately $3.60 million, and available operating cash is approximately $3.45 million. These are positive indicators. However, they do not mean the Department is fully caught up or that unrestricted cash is available for all obligations. Contractor and fee-for-service provider payments remain approximately four to six months behind, with a current provider/accounts payable balance owed of approximately $6.78 million. In addition, DHCS has reported that Lake County’s SMHS CFA balance is below the warning level, with a recommended deposit of approximately $788,811 to reach the target balance necessary to support continued claims payment.
The Department’s cash position is further affected by Realignment and State settlement activity. Although Lake County receives a Realignment allocation of approximately $2.23 million annually, State Hospital and managed care offsets significantly reduce the amount actually received by LCBHS. Across FY20/21 through FY25/26, approximately $13.39 million was allocated, but only approximately $5.47 million was received after offsets. State cost report, recoupment, and Unsatisfactory Immigration Status settlement activity also creates timing-sensitive cash movement that cannot be treated as unrestricted reserves available for provider payments, IGT/CFA, payroll, and loan repayment at the same time.
The remaining General Fund loan balance is therefore a governance and cash-flow decision, not simply a budget variance issue. The County’s General Fund position cannot support additional bridge loans to Behavioral Health. At the same time, an accelerated repayment requirement could destabilize the Department’s improving fiscal position by diverting cash needed for provider payments, payroll, IGT/CFA deposits, and core mandated services.
Staff recommends that the Board consider one of two viable paths for resolving the remaining $2 million balance: full or partial forgiveness of the balance, or an affordable long-term repayment plan tied to actual Behavioral Health cash capacity. If the Board does not support forgiveness, staff recommends a repayment structure that is modest, sustainable, and subject to annual review, with payments made only in a manner that does not impair provider payments, IGT/CFA capacity, payroll, or core service delivery.
The purpose of the workshop is to provide the Board with a clear understanding of the Department’s fiscal position, the State and local cash-flow mechanics contributing to the issue, the corrective actions already underway, and the governance decision needed to resolve the remaining General Fund loan balance while preserving behavioral health service access for Lake County residents.
If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:
Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________
Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply): ☒ Not applicable
☐ Fully Article X. <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI>- and/or Consultant Selection Policy <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Policy/Policies+$!26+Procedures+Manual/Ch4_2021v2.pdf>-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)
☐ Section 2-38 <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI> Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)
☐ For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Intranet+Forms/Information+Technology/AdvPlan.pdf> (“Yes,” if checked)
☐ Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)
Consistency with Vision 2028 <http://www.lakecountyca.gov/Government/Directory/Administration/Visioning/Vision2028.htm> (check all that apply): ☐ Not applicable
☒ Well-being of Residents ☐ Public Safety ☐ Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery
☒ Economic Development ☐ Infrastructure ☒ County Workforce
☐ Community Collaboration ☒ Business Process Efficiency ☐ Clear Lake
Recommended Action: Receive the workshop presentation, discuss stabilization thresholds and repayment principles, and provide direction regarding next steps for a fiscal stabilization framework.