Skip to main content
File #: 25-1088    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/31/2025 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 11/4/2025 Final action:
Title: Consideration of Funding Request for $50,000 Under BU 1892 Pursuant to Board Direction on September 23, 2025
Sponsors: Administrative Office, County Counsel
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Memorandum

 

 

Date:                                          November 4, 2025

 

To:                                          The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors

 

From:                                          Susan Parker, County Administrative Officer

                                          Lloyd C. Guintivano, County Counsel                                          

 

Subject:                     Consideration of Funding Request for $50,000 Under BU 1892 Pursuant to Board Direction on September 23, 2025

 

Executive Summary:

 

On September 23, 2025, your Board was informed of a funding request in the amount of $50,000 for One Team One Dream. Your Board then pulled this budget item for discussion regarding the County of Lake’s budget for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 pending further review from staff on whether approval of this funding is a gift of public funds in violation of the California Constitution.

 

Cal. Const., art. XVI, § 6 states that the “Legislature shall have no power to give or to lend, or to authorize the giving or lending,  of  the  credit  of  the  State,  or  of  any  county,  city  and  county,  city, township or other political corporation or subdivision of the State now existing, or that may be hereafter established, in aid of or to any person, association, or corporation, whether municipal or otherwise, or to pledge the credit thereof, in any  manner  whatever,  for  the  payment  of  the  liabilities  of  any  individual, association, municipal or other corporation whatever; nor shall it have power to make any gift or authorize the making of any gift, of any public money or thing of value to any individual, municipal or other corporation whatever.”

 

However, expenditures or disbursements made for a “public purpose” are not considered a gift of public funds. County of Alameda v. Janssen (1940) 16 Cal 2d 276, 281; Redevelopment Agency of San Pablo v. Shepard (1977, Cal App 1st Dist) 75 Cal. App 3d 453; Schettler v. County of Santa Clara (1977, Cal App 1st Dist) 74 Cal App 3d 990. The public purpose exception is liberally construed, and a “[d]etermination of public purpose is primarily a matter for the Legislature and will not be disturbed as long as it has a reasonable basis.”  County of Alameda v. Janssen (1940) 16 Cal 2d 276, 281. An expenditure valid under public purpose exception even if there is an incidental private benefit Redevelopment Agency of San Pablo v. Shepard (1977, Cal App 1st Dist) 75 Cal. App 3d 453 (citing County of Alameda v. Janssen (1940) 16 Cal 2d 276)).

 

Examples of what constitutes as a “public purpose” include expenditures for free school text books, transportation; tuition and living expenses for education of veterans, erection of memorial hall for war veterans]; street improvements; payments for destruction of diseased cattle; flood control; relief of indigent sick and poor; slum clearance; payment of delinquent assessments on overburdened property; free treatment in county hospital only for those unable to pay]. See 9 Cal. Law Rev. 431; payments to a nonprofit county fair county fair association whose purposes are those of a county fair.

 

In light of the foregoing, your Board may consider approving the funding request for One Team One Dream so long as the terms of the expenditure / disbursement expressly outlines the public purpose served by the funding recipient’s obligations under the memorandum of understanding, both in the recitals and said recipient’s scope of duties.    

 

 

If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:

Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________ 

 

Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply):                                           Not applicable

Fully Article X. <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI>- and/or Consultant Selection Policy <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Policy/Policies+$!26+Procedures+Manual/Ch4_2021v2.pdf>-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)                     

Section 2-38 <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI> Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)                     

For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Intranet+Forms/Information+Technology/AdvPlan.pdf> (“Yes,” if checked)

Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)

 

Consistency with Vision 2028 <http://www.lakecountyca.gov/Government/Directory/Administration/Visioning/Vision2028.htm> (check all that apply):                                                                Not applicable

Well-being of Residents                                           Public Safety                                                                Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery                     

Economic Development                                           Infrastructure                                                                County Workforce                     

Community Collaboration                      Business Process Efficiency                      Clear Lake                                                               

 

Recommended Action: Direction to staff.