Skip to main content
File #: 25-196    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Letter Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 2/25/2025 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 3/11/2025 Final action:
Title: Consideration of Letter of Support AB 418 (Wilson)
Sponsors: Treasurer-Tax Collector
Attachments: 1. Support Letter for AB 418 Wilson - County of Lake, 2. AB 418 (Wilson) Support joint ltr 2.20.25

Memorandum

 

 

Date:                                          March 11, 2025

 

To:                                          The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors

 

From:                                          Patrick Sullivan, Treasurer- Tax Collector

 

Subject:                     Consideration of a Position Letter of Support AB 418 (Wilson)

 

Executive Summary:

 

AB 418 (Wilson) is responsive to the May 25, 2023 United States Supreme Court decision, which unanimously ruled in Tyler v Hennepin County, Minnesota, et al. that Geraldine Tyler’s Constitutional rights were violated when Hennepin County, in Minnesota, auctioned her tax-defaulted property to satisfy the delinquent property tax debt worth $15,000. The property sold for $40,000. The County kept the remaining $25,000 in excess proceeds without first affording Ms. Tyler the right to file a claim for the excess proceeds. The Court found that the taking of the value of Ms. Tyler’s equity violated the Takings Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments and the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment.

 

AB 418 preserves the ability of counties to utilize so-called Chapter 8 sales that are used to dispose of challenging properties or facilitate the development of affordable housing or other local agency uses, while ensuring that the owners of that tax-defaulted property are able to participate in an administrative process if they disagree with the tax sale value established by the tax collector, and proposed for approval by the Board of Supervisors.

 

 

 

 

If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:

Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________ 

 

Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply):                                           Not applicable

Fully Article X. <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI>- and/or Consultant Selection Policy <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Policy/Policies+$!26+Procedures+Manual/Ch4_2021v2.pdf>-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)                     

Section 2-38 <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI> Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)                     

For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Intranet+Forms/Information+Technology/AdvPlan.pdf> (“Yes,” if checked)

Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)

 

Consistency with Vision 2028 <http://www.lakecountyca.gov/Government/Directory/Administration/Visioning/Vision2028.htm> (check all that apply):                                                                Not applicable

Well-being of Residents                                           Public Safety                                                                Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery                     

Economic Development                                           Infrastructure                                                                County Workforce                     

Community Collaboration                      Business Process Efficiency                      Clear Lake                                                               

 

Recommended Action:  Approve letter and authorize the chair to sign.