Legislation Details

File #: 26-0364    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/10/2026 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 5/19/2026 Final action:
Title: 11:00 A.M. - HEARING - Consideration of Request for Hearing before the Board of Supervisors for Code Enforcement Actions taken at 19355 S. State Hwy 29, Middletown (APN 014-270-02); Property Owner: Michael G. Burns
Sponsors: Community Development
Attachments: 1. Hearing Request, 2. Property Map, 3. Use Permit 88-2 Conditions of Approval, 4. Planning Commission Minutes (1998), 5. Letter from Planning to Michael Burns, 6. Staff Report (1999), 7. Action Sheet (August 2, 1999), 8. Complaint Received (06/05/2023), 9. Site Photos 10/22/2025 - Attachment I, 10. Site Photos 12/16/2025 - Attachment J, 11. Posting of Notices - Attachment K
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Memorandum

 

 

Date:                                          May 19, 2026

 

To:                                          The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors

 

From:                                          Mireya G. Turner, Community Development Director

                                          Prepared by: Marcus Beltramo, Code Enforcement Manager

 

Subject:                     11:00 AM - Consideration of Request for Hearing before the Board of Supervisors for: 19355 S. State Hwy 29, Middletown, CA / APN# 14-270-02

 

Executive Summary:

 

Michael G. Burns (Burns), as a trustee on behalf of a trust in his name, requested a hearing in front of the Board of Supervisors regarding a Notice of Nuisance and Order to Abate (NONOTA) and a Notice of Violation (NOV) issued against the subject property for the following reasons: (1) Burns has been in business at this location for over twenty-five (25) years and selling since 1972; and (2) Burns provides a valuable service to the area (Attachment A - Appeal)

 

On February 4, 2026, Lake County Code Enforcement (CE) issued a “Notice of Violation (NOV) and a “Notice of Nuisance and Order to  Abate” (NONOTA) against the subject property located at  19355 Hwy 29, Middletown, CA for violation(s) of the Lake County Code (LCC) pertaining to the use of land, buildings, and premises operated, maintained, or contrary to the Lake County Zoning Ordinance and public nuisance violation(s): (1) inconsistent use of the land contrary with what the zoning designation allows; (2) failure to obtain a use permit to use the land as an auto dismantling facility; (3) industrial and residential accessory uses inconsistent with the what the zoning allows; (4) structures situated or constructed without obtaining zoning clearances; (5) occupation of dwellings that do not meet minimum construction standards (recreational vehicles); (6) open and outdoor storage not maintained in compliance; (7) existence of garbage or refuse; (8) existence of inoperable, dismantled, or wrecked motor vehicles or boats or parts thereof; (9) construction without first obtaining building permits.

 

The hearing request was made pursuant to LCC Chapter 13, Article I, Section 13-7.1 - A hearing before the Board of Supervisors regarding a Notice of Nuisance and Order to Abate may be requested by filing a written request for a hearing with the Lake County Community Development Department within twenty-one (21) days of service of the Notice of Nuisance and Order to Abate. When a hearing is requested as provided for in the Notice of Nuisance and Order to Abate, the Board shall proceed to hear the testimony of the Enforcement Official, his/her assistants or deputies, the testimony of the owner or his/her representatives, and the testimony of other competent persons concerning the conditions constituting such nuisance, the estimated cost of abatement, and other matters which the Board may deem pertinent. Any person affected may be present at such hearing, may be represented by counsel, may present testimony, and may cross-examine the Enforcement Official, and other witnesses. The hearing may be continued from time to time.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

Property / Background Information:

 

19355 S Hwy 29, Middletown, CA - (Attachment B - Property Map)

 

Ownership Information as reflected on county records: On November 17, 1995, Michael and Shirley Burns granted interest to the Michael Burns and Shirley J. Burns, Trustees of the Michael Burns and Shirley Burns Trust, UAD 10/27/95. The trust has 100% interest in the property.

 

Zoning Designation: “RL” Rural Land; Primary Purpose: To provide for resource related and residential uses of the County’s undeveloped lands that are remote and often characterized by steep topography, fire hazards, and limited access. 

Zoning Designation History:  In 8/2010 - An update to the Middletown Area Plan was adopted changing the zoning designation to its current zoning of “RL”.  Prior, the subject property had a zoning designation of “M2” which allows for heavy industrial and manufacturing uses. 

 

Current Land Use: Unpermitted Operation of a recycling and auto dismantling facility (industrial use); occupation of dwellings that do not meet residential construction standard; storage or personal items contrary to zoning performance standards; existence of inoperable, wrecked, or dismantled vehicles.

 

Use Permit history:

May 1989 - Use Permit 88-2 - an application was received from Edward Caswell to renew an expired permit for an existing auto dismantling operation. The staff report states the business use as an auto dismantling operation with part sales open to the public, storage of heavy equipment, impound yard for CHP and Sheriff Department, storage tanks for oil, gas, and other fluids removed from junked vehicles.  At the time the property was zoned “M2” and “U”.  This permit was valid until August 24, 1994. (Attachment C - Paragraph 16 Conditions of Approval)

 

1994 - Use Permit 88-2 expired.

 

1996 - Burns applied for a Use Permit to operate a recycling and auto dismantling facility at the subject property.

 

January 8, 1998 - Planning Commission minutes state the application for a proposed auto wrecking facility by Burns has been incomplete for more than one year. (Attachment D - Planning Commission Minutes)

 

June 23, 1999 - A letter from the Planning Division was mailed to Burns informing him his application for a use permit was incomplete and being scheduling the project for denial without prejudice before the Planning Commission. (Attachment E - Staff Report)

 

July 15, 1999 - The Planning Commission denied the use permit without prejudice. (Attachment F)

 

August 2, 1999 - County records reflect Burns’s application for a use permit was denied without prejudice.  (Attachment G)

 

Current date - Currently, Department records do reflect there is an active use permit to conduct the uses occurring and existing on the property.

 

Past Code Enforcement actions: On 6/5/2023 - Complaint received from the public alleging: Adults and children living in trailers. Dogs tied and running loose. Selling drugs and using drugs. Stolen items on property.  (Attachment H)

 

Other Agency Information: Lake County Environmental Health Department regulates the site under Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) program as well as a closed burn dump under the County’s Solid Waste program.  Both programs are overseen by the State through various branches of CalEPA.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            

Investigation / Fact(s):

 

Basis: A Code Enforcement case was opened based on an initial site visit with the Sheriff’s Office (SO) in which several potential code violations were observed to be existing on the property, including but not limited to, persons occupying or living in recreational vehicles; storage not in compliance; uses of the property inconsistent with the uses allowed by the current zoning designation. After a review with the Planning Division, it was determined that no use permit had been approved for Burns to use the land, buildings, or premises for an auto dismantling or recycling. Code Enforcement conducted an investigation to compile evidence, based on physical observations, statements made by Burns, review of public information, review of public agency information, and with assistance from the Planning Division. (Exhibit I - Site Photos 10/22/25)

 

On December 16, 2025, Burns allowed a site inspection that was conducted by Code Enforcement and Environmental Health.  (Attachment J - Site photos 12/16/2025)

 

On February 4, 2026, a “NOV” and “NONOTA” were issued against the property for violation(s) of the LCC. The violations consisted of: (Attachment K - NONOTA and NOV dated 2/4/2026)

 

Use of land, buildings, or premises contrary to the provisions of the zoning ordinance

 

The property is zoned “RL”, which the primary purpose is: To provide for resource related and

residential uses of the County’s undeveloped lands that are remote and often characterized by steep

topography, fire hazards, and limited access.

 

Code Enforcement conducted an investigation to compile evidence, based on physical observations,

statements made by Burns, review of public information, review of public agency information, input from

the Planning Division.  Based on the evidence collected Code Enforcement determined the following

violation(s) exist:

 

                     1) The current use of the property is for an auto dismantling facility and recycling, which are considered industrial uses.  The industrial uses are contrary to the current zoning which allows for residential uses.

 

                     2) Open and Outdoor storage is not maintained in compliance or contrary to the zoning performance standards.

 

                     3) Occupation of recreational vehicles, that are not being used for recreational or emergency purposes, that do not meet minimum residential construction standards and which is contrary to the zoning ordinance.

 

                     4) Structures were erected or constructed contrary to the zoning ordinance by not first obtaining a zoning clearance.

 

Failure to obtain a Use Permit as required by the zoning ordinance

 

The current use of the property is an auto dismantling facility and recycling and storage related to this

use.  Per the Planning Division, the zoning ordinance requires the issuance of a use permit prior to the

commencement of the use.  In addition, per the planning division the current use is inconsistent with the

zoning designation and is not allowed.

 

Burns applied for a use permit in 1996 to use the land to operate an auto dismantling facility and recycling. 

The resolution to that application was denial without prejudice.  At the time of application, the property was

zoned to allow for this use.  In 2010, the property was rezoned from “M2” to its current designation “RL”. 

The “RL” designation does not allow the beforementioned use.  The Department does not have any record

of an active use permit having been issued to allow the current use of an auto dismantling facility.

 

The property has been in a state of non-compliance for over twenty-five (25) years.

 

Existence of inoperable, dismantled, wrecked motor vehicles or boats or parts thereof

 

Code Enforcement observed on the property is the existence of inoperable, dismantled, wrecked

motor vehicles or boats or parts thereof.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

County Witness(es):

Marcus Beltramo, Code Enforcement Manager

Christopher Colen, Code Enforcement Program Coordinator (lead Code Enforcement Officer)

Logan Smith, Code Enforcement Officer

Mireya G. Turner, Community Development Department Director / Planning Division

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      

 

 

 

If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:

Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________ 

 

Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply):                                           Not applicable

Fully Article X. <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI>- and/or Consultant Selection Policy <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Policy/Policies+$!26+Procedures+Manual/Ch4_2021v2.pdf>-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)                     

Section 2-38 <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI> Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)                     

For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Intranet+Forms/Information+Technology/AdvPlan.pdf> (“Yes,” if checked)

Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)

 

Consistency with Vision 2028 <http://www.lakecountyca.gov/Government/Directory/Administration/Visioning/Vision2028.htm> (check all that apply):                                                                Not applicable

Well-being of Residents                                           Public Safety                                                                Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery                     

Economic Development                                           Infrastructure                                                                County Workforce                     

Community Collaboration                      Business Process Efficiency                      Clear Lake                                                               

 

Recommended Action: 

 

Staff recommends the Board of Supervisors uphold the Notice of Nuisance and Order to Abate and direct the property owner(s) to voluntarily abate within thirty (30) days and to authorize staff to abate the nuisance if it is not voluntarily abated and that all associated costs of the abatement become a charge against the property and placed on the tax rolls as a special assessment.

 

Instruct Staff and Burns to come to an agreement for a compliance plan.  The compliance plan will consist of the scope of work and timeframes in which to accomplish certain thresholds or criteria. The County Counsel’s Office shall work with Code Enforcement to reduce any agreement to writing that can later be legally enforceable if there is a breach of the agreement and to include possible monetary penalties and to allow for cost recovery.