Skip to main content
File #: 25-910    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 9/5/2025 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 9/23/2025 Final action:
Title: 1:00 P.M. - Consideration of Request for Board Direction regarding Establishment of Ad Hoc Committee for Development of Agriculture Road Standards
Sponsors: Community Development
Attachments: 1. Reso 2019-124 Fire Safe Regulations Applicable to Outdoor Cannabis Cultivation, 2. Napa-County-Road-and-Street-Standards
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Memorandum

 

 

Date:                                          September 23, 2025

 

To:                                          The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors

 

From:                                          Mireya G. Turner, Community Development Director

 

Subject:                     Consideration of Request for Board Direction regarding Establishment of Ad Hoc Committee for Development of Agriculture Road Standards

 

Executive Summary: On August 27, 2019, the Board adopted Resolution 2019-124, Adopting Recommendations to Address Fire Safe Regulations Applicable to Outdoor Cannabis Cultivation. At that time, because the cultivation of cannabis had been labeled “commercial cannabis cultivation”, there was confusion regarding the appropriate road standard requirements. In this case, the term “commercial cannabis cultivation” is meant to differentiate a legal and permitted activity from the pre-Prop 64 unregulated cannabis industry. The Board recognized that cannabis cultivation, even for commercial purposes, is a similar agricultural process to the cultivation of any other commercial crop in Lake County. 

 

In addition to local regulations, Public Resource Code 4290 and 4291 provide for the implementation of minimum fire safety standards on certain real properties. These standards vary according to the type of activity taking place. The cultivation of agriculture crops are held to driveway standards, whereas commercial activity such as agricultural crop processing and manufacturing are held to commercial road standards.

 

Resolution 2019-124 provided clarification that cannabis cultivation permit projects, when limited solely to outdoor cultivation, qualifies for the same exemption to commercial road standards as other types of agricultural crops.

 

Although the agenda title limited Board action to cannabis cultivation, robust discussion took place regarding the establishment of road standards for all cultivation activities. The Board expressed interest in forming an ad hoc committee representing various aspects of the local agricultural industries, including but not limited to pear, walnut, winegrape, hemp, and cannabis cultivators, Fire Protection Districts, Lake County Winegrape Association, and Lake County Farm Bureau.

 

Napa County has standards for agricultural roads which seem straightforward and would serve as a reference for the ad hoc committee to consider. Their recommendations would then go before the Agriculture Advisory Committee and Planning Commission for consideration, before returning to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Because of Board input at the beginning of this process, and consideration of recommendations at the conclusion, Staff does not request Board membership in the ad hoc committee. This team would be considered a working group, assembled for a specific purpose and disbanded at the conclusion of its recommendations. The Community Development Department would extend invitations to contacts in the various categories and would coordinate and lead the meetings. Meetings would be held virtually and would not be subject to the Brown Act. Due to its relevance to cannabis regulations, it would follow the same timeline as the current update to existing cannabis regulations.

 

Staff requests Board direction regarding the formation of an ad hoc committee/working group for the development of agriculture road standards. 

 

 

 

 

If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:

Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________ 

 

Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply):                                           Not applicable

Fully Article X.- and/or Consultant Selection Policy-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)                     

Section 2-38 Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)                     

For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee (“Yes,” if checked)

Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)

 

Consistency with Vision 2028 (check all that apply):                                                                Not applicable

Well-being of Residents                                           Public Safety                                                                Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery                     

Economic Development                                           Infrastructure                                                                County Workforce                     

Community Collaboration                      Business Process Efficiency                      Clear Lake                                                               

 

Recommended Action: Direct Staff regarding the formation and membership categories of the Agriculture Road Standards Ad Hoc Committee/Working Group.