Skip to main content
File #: 26-0050    Version: 2 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/23/2026 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 2/24/2026 Final action:
Title: 11:10 A.M. - Consideration of Presentation of Deficit Tax Default Land Sale Letter and Memo
Sponsors: Auditor-Controller/County Clerk
Attachments: 1. Explanation of Teeter Plan, 2. TDLS Repay Memo, 3. Added 2-20_Tax Default Land Sale 160-162 Repayment Summary, 4. BOS Letter - TDLS Deficit Repayment 2-24-26
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Memorandum

 

 

Date:                                          February 24th, 2026

 

To:                                          The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors

 

From:                                          Jenavive Herrington, Auditor-Controller/Clerk

 

Subject:                     Presentation of Deficit Tax Default Land Sale Letter and Memo

 

Executive Summary:

 

At the 12/9/2025 meeting when discussing Item 7.2, the Board requested I bring forth my planned communication (letter and memo) with agencies regarding any repayment due to deficit tax defaulted land sales.

 

The attached memo provides background regarding the Teeter program in Lake County, as well as other events that affected tax sales - including deficits. This was in an effort to explain how the erroneous overdistribution of property tax revenue occurred.

 

Software system limitations allowed for erroneous distribution of funds that had not been collected.

For cash flow purposes, I suggest aligning repayment with Teeter distributions, although the actual recovery will come from the revenue account respective to the direct charge overpayment.

 

Revenue and Taxation codes related to the Teeter program do not apply to the negative apportionment that must occur to recover the overdistribution, as the direct charges in question are not covered under the Teeter program.

 

 

 

If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:

Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________ 

 

Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply):                                           Not applicable

Fully Article X. <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI>- and/or Consultant Selection Policy <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Policy/Policies+$!26+Procedures+Manual/Ch4_2021v2.pdf>-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)                     

Section 2-38 <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI> Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)                     

For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Intranet+Forms/Information+Technology/AdvPlan.pdf> (“Yes,” if checked)

Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)

 

Consistency with Vision 2028 <http://www.lakecountyca.gov/Government/Directory/Administration/Visioning/Vision2028.htm> (check all that apply):                                                                Not applicable

Well-being of Residents                                           Public Safety                                                                Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery                     

Economic Development                                           Infrastructure                                                                County Workforce                     

Community Collaboration                      Business Process Efficiency                      Clear Lake                                                               

 

Recommended Action:  No action. Presentation only.