Legislation Details

File #: 26-0570    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 5/21/2026 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 6/9/2026 Final action:
Title: 10:00 A.M. - Public Hearing - (Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District, Board of Directors) LCAQMD FY 26/27 Draft Budget Hearing for Budget Units #8799 & #8798
Sponsors: Air Quality Management District
Attachments: 1. Draft Budget Hearing Memo and Recommendations, 2. Attachment 1 Budget #8799 FY 26-27, 3. Attachment 2 Budget #8798 FY 26-27, 4. Attachment 3 Legal Notice
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Memorandum

 

 

Date:                                          June 9, 2026

 

To:                                          The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors

 

From:                                          Douglas Gearhart, APCO

 

Subject:                     10:00 A.M. - Public Hearing - (Sitting as the Lake County Air Quality Management District, Board of Directors) LCAQMD FY 26/27 Draft Budget Hearing for Budget Units #8799 & #8798

 

Executive Summary:

 

The Lake County Air Quality Management District (District) maintains an active and effective air quality management program to protect the health and welfare of the populace of the Lake County Air Basin.  This is a shared mission with State and Federal agencies.  The District has primary responsibility for stationary air pollution sources in conformance with all District regulations and State and Federal laws.  As a designated Air Basin, the District participates in several Local, State and Federal programs by law.  The District’s attainment status with all of the Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS) has enabled flexibility when meeting State and Federal requirements.

 

The above referenced, June 9, 2026, draft budget hearing is intended to meet the requirements of California Health and Safety Code (H&SC) Section 40131. 

 

 

If not budgeted, fill in the blanks below only:

Estimated Cost: ________ Amount Budgeted: ________ Additional Requested: ________ Future Annual Cost: ________ 

 

Purchasing Considerations (check all that apply):                                           Not applicable

Fully Article X. <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI>- and/or Consultant Selection Policy <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Policy/Policies+$!26+Procedures+Manual/Ch4_2021v2.pdf>-Compliant (describe process undertaken in “Executive Summary”)                     

Section 2-38 <https://library.municode.com/ca/lake_county/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH2AD_ARTXPU_S2-38EXCOBI> Exemption from Competitive Bidding (rationale in “Executive Summary,” attach documentation, as needed)                     

For Technology Purchases: Vetted and Supported by the Technology Governance Committee <http://lcnet.co.lake.ca.us/Assets/Intranet/Intranet+Forms/Information+Technology/AdvPlan.pdf> (“Yes,” if checked)

Other (Please describe in Executive Summary)

 

Consistency with Vision 2028 <http://www.lakecountyca.gov/Government/Directory/Administration/Visioning/Vision2028.htm> (check all that apply):                                                                Not applicable

Well-being of Residents                                           Public Safety                                                                Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Recovery                     

Economic Development                                           Infrastructure                                                                County Workforce                     

Community Collaboration                      Business Process Efficiency                      Clear Lake                                                               

 

Recommended Action: 

1)                     That the Board of Directors approve the FY 26/27 Draft Budget proposed for the District;

 

2)                     That the Board of Directors continue to be on record as opposed to any further State subvention cuts to the District, and is in support of the District pursuing increased State subvention funding to cover Legislative/State mandates;

 

3)                     That the Board of Directors continue their policy directive that health impacts, health risks, health based complaints, and mandated programs/requirements be given top priority, followed by activities that have regulatory time frames, and other funded activities.