File #: 24-66    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 1/11/2024 In control: Planning Commission
On agenda: 1/25/2024 Final action:
Title: PUBLIC HEARING - Consideration of proposed Major Use Permit (UP 21-27), and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS 21-27), for approval of 21,600-sf mixed-light commercial cannabis cultivation; Applicant: Sky High Farms/Kathy Crist; Located:10788 Sky High Ridge Road, Lower Lake (APN:122-340-02)
Sponsors: Community Development
Attachments: 1. Site Plans, 2. Draft Conditions of Approval, 3. Property Management Plan, 4. Initial Study, 5. Hydrology and Drought Management Plan, 6. Agency Comments, 7. Tribal Comments, 8. Staff Report
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Staff Report

 

 

Date:                                          January 25th, 2024

 

To:                                          Planning Commission

 

From:                                          Mireya G. Turner, Director

                                          Prepared by: Mary Claybon, Assistant Planner II

 

Subject:                       Consideration of proposed Major Use Permit (UP 21-27), and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS 21-27), for approval of 21,600-sf mixed-light commercial cannabis cultivation; Applicant: Sky High Farms LLC/Kathy Crist; Located: 10788 Sky High Ridge Road, Lower Lake (APN:122-340-02)

 

Executive Summary:

The applicant, Kathy Crist, requests discretionary approval from the County of Lake for a Major Use Permit, (UP 21-27), for commercial cannabis cultivation at 10788 Sky High Ridge Road, Lower Lake (APN: 122-340-02). The proposed project will include cultivation of 21,600 sf Mixed-light cannabis canopy area and one (1) A-Type 13 Self-distribution License. The zoning is “RL” Rural Lands and the parcel is approximately 27.16 acres.

 

Recommended Action: 

Staff recommends the Planning Commission take the following actions:

A. Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS 21-27) for Major Use Permit (UP 21-27) with the following findings:

 

1. Potential environmental impacts related to Aesthetics can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures AES-1 through AES-2.

 

2. Potential environmental impacts related to Air Quality can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures AQ-1 through AQ-6.

 

3. Potential environmental impacts related to Biological Resources can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures BOI-1 through BOI-4.

 

4. Potential environmental impacts related to Cultural Resources can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures CUL-1 through CUL-2.

 

5. Potential environmental impacts related to Hazards and Hazardous Material can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-8.

 

6. Potential environmental impacts related to Hydrology and Water Quality can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures HYD-1 through HYD-2.

 

7. Potential environmental impacts related to Noise can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures NOI-1 through NOI-2.

 

8. Potential environmental impacts related to Wildfire can be mitigated to less than significant levels with the inclusion of mitigation measures WDF-1 through WDF-5.

 

B. Approve Major Use Permit (UP 21-27) with the following findings:

 

1. That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the use applied for will not under the circumstances, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort, and general welfare of the persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the County.

 

2. The site is adequate in size, shape, locations, and physical characteristics to accommodate the type of use and level of development proposed.

 

3. The streets, highways and pedestrian facilities are reasonably adequate to safely accommodate the proposed use.

 

4. There are adequate services to serve the project.

 

5. This project is consistent with the Lake County General Plan, Lower Lake Area Plan, and Lake County Zoning Ordinance.

 

6. No violation of Chapter 5, 17, 21, 23 or 26 of the Lake County Code currently exists on this property, with a condition of approval implemented.

 

7. The proposed use complies with all development standards described in Chapter 21, Article 27, Section 1.i.

 

8. The applicant is qualified to make the application described in Chapter 21, Article 27, Section 1.ii.(g).

 

9. The application complies with the qualifications for a permit described in Chapter 21, Article 27, Section 1.ii.(i).