Legislation Details

File #: 26-0380    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 4/16/2026 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 4/21/2026 Final action:
Title: 10:00 A.M. - Consideration of Resolution Approving the Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement of Public Risk Innovation, Solutions and Management (PRISM), and Authorize the Chair to Sign.
Sponsors: County Counsel
Attachments: 1. resolution01-3, 2. Lake Co BOS Presentation 4-21-26b, 3. JPA Amendments 2026 Final, 4. JPA Agreement - Final Redline, 5. Summary of JPA redlines March 2026, 6. Lake_JPA_79, 7. Lake_JPA_80, 8. Lake_JPA_87, 9. Lake_JPA_88, 10. Lake_JPA_93, 11. Lake_JPA_96, 12. Lake_JPA_05, 13. Lake_JPA_06
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Memorandum


Date: April 21, 2026

To: The Honorable Lake County Board of Supervisors

From: Lloyd C. Guintivano, County Counsel

Subject: Consideration of Resolution Approving the Amendment to the Joint Powers Agreement of Public Risk Innovation, Solutions and Management (PRISM), and Authorize the Chair to Sign.

Executive Summary:
PRISM was formed by and for the California counties in 1979 by the California State Association of Counties (CSAC). Today, 54 out of the 58 counties in California participate in one or more of the PRISM programs. In 2001, PRISM expanded its offerings to other California public agencies. At this point, over 70% of the cities in California participate in one or more of the PRISM programs. In addition, a variety of special districts, school districts, and JPAs also participate in PRISM Programs. PRISM is recognized as the largest public entity property and casualty pool in the United States.

After 25 years of having public entity members participate in PRISM, the members of PRISM have proposed to update the composition of the Board of Directors to recognize the partnership that the counties have with the public entity members. At present, the PRISM Board of Directors is composed of 54 county members (all county members have a voting position on the Board of Directors) and 7 public entity voting spots for a total of 61 voting members. There are also 3 alternates for the public entity votes, but they only stand in place of the 7 voting spots and not in addition to. The proposal is to add 10 additional voting public entity board seats so that the total number of public entity voting seats will be 17 (with 3 additional alternates) instead of 7 (with 3 additional alternates). This results in a total of 71 voting Board of Directors seats. Under this proposal, the counties will have a total of 76% of the total voting Board of Director seats.

In addition, the PRISM members have also proposed to update the composition of the Execut...

Click here for full text