File #: 17-329    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Action Item Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 3/22/2017 In control: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
On agenda: 3/28/2017 Final action:
Title: 9:10 A.M. - Consideration of Request for Board Direction on Negotiating Public Defender Contract Proposals
Sponsors: Administrative Office
Attachments: 1. RFP_1012-0217, 2. LakeIndigentSvcs_Proposal, 3. LawOfficesJosephAhart_Proposal, 4. RichardCiummo_Proposal
Title
Body
MEMORANDUM

TO: Board of Supervisors
FROM: Carol J. Huchingson, County Administrative Officer
DATE: March 28, 2017
SUBJECT: 9:10 A.M. - Consideration of Request for Board Direction as to Public Defender Contract Negotiations
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

As you may be aware, our current Public Defender contractor has given notice, within the terms of the agreement, with the last day of service set for May 6, 2017. As the County is constitutionally mandated to provide Public Defender Services, our office issued a Request for Proposals to secure a new contractor. We received three proposals and interviewed representatives from each of the three proposers (not in ranked order):

Lake Indigent Defense
Proposal is based on impending partnership of two local attorneys, David Markham and Andrea Sullivan, who have worked under the outgoing contractor. Proposed partnership includes one partner who meets the requirements of the RFP (five years of experience in criminal law) and one who does not. Proposer intends to open a local office, with a "timeshare" approach to administration of the program with the two partners overseeing one week on/one week off, subcontracting with existing Public Defender attorneys who have been working under the outgoing contractor. Proposer's interview included emphasis on meeting the needs of the existing Public Defender contract attorneys. Since one partner does not meet RFP requirements, before moving forward with a contract, we would need assurance from the qualifying partner that he would commit to actively overseeing the program throughout the contract term (ending June 30, 2020) and that he would agree to accept final decision-making authority and responsibility. Total cost of proposal is second out of three.

Law Office of Joseph M. Ahart, Inc.
Proposer is based in Shasta County. and meets all requirements of the RFP. Proposer currently provides similar services under contract in Shasta County. Proposer intends to open a...

Click here for full text